Answer :
Citizens United argued that the EC disclosure and disclaimer requirements were unconstitutional because the Supreme Court in WRTL narrowed the constitutionally permissible scope of "electioneering communication" to communications that are not "susceptible of [a] reasonable.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. It was debated in 2009 and resolved in 2010. The court ruled 5-4 that the First Amendment's free speech clause prohibits the government from restricting corporations' independent expenditures for political campaigns, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.
Citizens United, a conservative non-profit organization, attempted to air and advertise a film critical of then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton shortly before the 2008 Democratic primary elections.
Learn more about Citizens United to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/480568
#SPJ4