When figures are translated, rotated or reflected, the resulting figures are congruent to the original figure because the transformations are rigid. However, when a figure is dilated, the resulting figure is not congruent to the original figure.
ABCD and A'B'C'D are congruent because A'B'C'D is the result of rotating ABCD 180 degrees about the origin.
I've included the missing graph as an attachment.
Using points A and A' as our references.
We have:
[tex]A = (-1,1)[/tex]
[tex]A' = (1,-1)[/tex]
The rule of rotation 180 degrees about the origin is:
[tex](x,y) \to (-x,-y)[/tex]
So, we have:
[tex](-1,1) \to (-(-1),-1)[/tex]
[tex](-1,1) \to (1,-1)[/tex]
The above rule is applicable to other points in ABCD and A'B'C'D'
Since the rule of transformation is rotation (a rigid transformation), then ABCD and A'B'C'D are congruent.
Read more at:
https://brainly.com/question/9475847
