Do you think restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over fails the strict scrutiny test for
equal protection under the law? Why or why not?


Answer :

Answer: No

Explanation: Strict scrutiny will often be invoked in an equal protection claim. For a court to apply strict scrutiny, the legislature must either have passed a law that infringes upon a fundamental right or involves a suspect classification. Suspect classifications include race, national origin, religion, and alienage.

Restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over doesn't fail the strict scrutiny test for equal protection under the law.

What is Strict scrutiny test?

This is defined as a form of  judicial review employed by courts to ascertain the constitutionality of laws.

Restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over doesn't fail the strict scrutiny test for equal protection under the law because there is no human right infringement and it's applicable to all gender, race etc.

Read more about Strict scrutiny test here https://brainly.com/question/14826245

#SPJ2

Go Question: Other Questions